Science has been cancelled: Health of our oceans & harp seals sacrificed for east coast votes
There is a DFO letter making the rounds online, defending the 2012 harp seal Total Allowable Catch (TAC) which was set at an unsustainably high 400,000 last week. The letter is signed by Morley Knight, Director-General of Resource Management at DFO, and attempts to mislead convince the public the TAC was set “in accordance with the internationally recognized precautionary approach.”
It’s not surprising DFO has gone into repair mode in response to the bashlash to the news the Fisheries Minister had ignored the advice of his own scientists and had set the 2012 harp seal Total Allowable Catch at the request of sealing industry executives. Both IFAW and HSI condemned the TAC. My own letter, representing Atlantic Canadians, was published in four newspapers.
Nor is it surprising a government bureaucrat signed the editorial defending the TAC; it is highly unlikely any of the ignored scientists would agree to put their name on such a work of fiction.
Mr. Knight seems to be in denial of two concrete irrefutable facts:
(1) The Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat concluded in its most recent Science Advisory Report the harp seal herd is in decline and the 2012 TAC should not exceed 300,000, as anything higher would not respect DFO’s management plan; and
Setting TACs to appease the sealing industry while ignoring scientific advice is not “in accordance with the internationally recognized precautionary approach,” although Mr. Knight seems to expect the public to believe it is.
DFO has a long history of basing conservation decisions based on political expediency rather than science. DFO mismanaged cod into commercial extinction and has consistently failed to protect endangered species such as porbeagle shark and sockeye salmon for “socio-economic” reasons. Now it is placing the future of harp seals at risk.
Sealer about to beat to death 2- or 3-week old pup still almost completely covered in whitecoat Photo: Sheryl Fink/IFAW 2012
I was reading an article in the Ottawa Citizen this morning detailing how the government’s failure to set start dates for the commercial seal hunt in Newfoundland was causing wide-spread concern for the problems it would pose for rural towns along the east coast. Featured in the article were doomsday-style quotes by Canadian Sealers Association executive Frank Pinhorn and Bonavista Mayor Betty Fitzgerald. There were warnings about rapidly expanding hordes of voracious harp seals patrolling the coastline devouring all the cod and dire predictions that if the the hordes weren’t ”controlled” (read: slaughtered via club, hakapik and rifle) the fish would disappear and so would all the jobs on the east coast.
It is difficult to discern if Pinhorn and Fitzgerald are honestly deluded about seals and cod, or are guilty of wilfully spreading misinformation. In any event, both are incorrect in their recent statements to media.
Pinhorn speaks of the “growing seal population,” claiming it is at a record-high of nine to 10 million, while Fitzgerald insists the seal population must be controlled to protect fish stocks. Both Pinhorn and Fitzgerald need to read the latest Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat’s Science Advisory Report in which DFO scientists Mike Hammill and Garry Stenson advise the harp seal population is declining, with a current population of approximately 7 million individuals, and accordingly, the Total Allowable Catch should be reduced by 25%. There has never been credible science supporting these wild claims that seals are preventing fish stocks from rebounding after years of gross human overfishing. In fact, for those who bother investigating the issue, there is an emerging wealth of information to the contrary.
Fitzgerald and Pinhorn are guilty of the sort of irresponsible scaremongering that promotes the misconception seals must be culled to protect fish stocks. In truth, science indicates seals play an important role in our complex marine ecosystem and should be protected for the overall health of our oceans. Fitzgerald and Pinhorn would do well to quit the melodrama and stick to the facts.
In terms of claims that “lack of an April seal hunting season could pose a problem for rural towns along the coast,” the only problem the cancellation of the 2012 Newfoundland harp seal hunt poses is the sealers would miss out on their annual beer-swilling baby seal-bashing social event. As one sealer told Paul Watson years ago, “Every year we gets to go out on the ice, get away from the old lady, drink beer with the boys and whack seals” and as sealer Desmond Adams told media a few years ago, “We all go out for the love of it rather than the money, which isn’t there anymore.” This is not a commercial seal hunt or a hunt for subsistence – this is a yearly social event for people who love beating and shooting to death screaming seal pups. And Canadian taxpayers are footing the bill. That, to me, is a very real problem.
If anyone had any illusions the Canadian government is being truthful about the commercial seal hunt, those illusions surely have been shattered this past week. I grew up knowing the commercial seal hunt was wrong, the killing was cruel and the whole disgusting business was unnecessary. My grandmother, originally from a remote island known as Rams Island (later renamed Iona before being cleared and its inhabitants moved to the mainland) in Newfoundland, disagreed with my view, and I remember bitter words being spoken on the subject. But when I actually witnessed the killing for myself for the first time in 2007 it struck me – the Canadian public has truly been betrayed by the Canadian government. The Canadian government uses our taxes to fund the killing and misleads us in regard to every single aspect of the sadistic practice, while branding people like me – who have seen the slaughter with their own eyes – liars. I have never lied about what I have witnessed in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia. The Canadian government is the guilty party. Here are just a few of the many lies told by our government:
LIE #1: Baby seals aren’t killed. THE TRUTH: Oh yes, they are – even protected whitecoats and bluebacks are killed by sealers.
This seal pup is almost completely covered in white fur and was likely 14 days old when it was killed. Not even eating solid food, still very much a baby. Photo Frank Loftus/HSUS 2011
The Canadian government claims all seals killed in the commercial seal hunt are self-reliant adults. In actual fact, seals targeted during the commercial seal hunt are between the ages of 12 days and three months, with most being under one month of age. Many, like the pup in the photo here, are still almost completely covered in white fur at the time of their death. At this age they are not swimming, nor are they eating solid food. Recently weaned, they live on fat reserves built up from their mom’s milk until they’re ready to leave the ice and swim away.
In truth, a seal can legally be killed once it begins moulting its whitecoat, which usually happens at about 12 days of age. Recently weaned, unable to swim, escape or defend themselves against sealers, they are as helpless as babies and certainly are NOT the self-reliant adults DFO would like you to believe are the target of the commercial seal hunt.
The Canadian government is quick to point out that since 1982 it has been illegal to kill whitecoats (harp pups younger than 12 days) and bluebacks (hooded seal pups younger than 14 months). This ban came into effect following an EU-wide ban on whitecoat seal products which caused the sealing industry to collapse. The Canadian government has been silent on reports coming from observers that sealers were documented killing protected bluebacks.
LIE #2 – The commercial seal hunt is humane. THE TRUTH – Every year observers compile hours of videotaped evidence sealers routinely violate woefully inadequate Regulations and inflict horrific cruelty on seal pups.
Conscious seal pups are stabbed through the eye socket and jaw with metal hooks and hauled onto boats - this is NOT illegal and is documented each year. Photo: Frank Loftus/HSUS 2011
I observed the commercial seal hunt from 2007 – 2010 and the horrors I witnessed will stay with me forever. I was unable to travel to Newfoundland this year but have been following closely reports from Humane Society International/Canada and IFAW observers. The reports have been grisly, to put it mildly. Just a few instances:
Sealers failing to perform 3-step process, slicing open seal pups still alive and possibly conscious;
Seal pups showing conscious reaction to pain – voluntary movement – after being sliced open and hurled into the bottom of sealing boat;
Seal pups being shot in close proximity to each other as they desperately try to escape;
Seal pups being shot in the face, neck and back, suffering on the ice for long periods of time before boats reach them to finish them off;
Seal pups being shot on the ice and just left to die – sealers not even retrieving them from the ice – killing for sport;
Terrified seal pups being harassed and manhandled by sealers posing for photos.
This video, by International Fund for Animal Welfare, shows a seal pup sliced open and thrown into a boat, waving and clenching a front flipper in pain as it bleeds to death slowly in the bottom of the boat with other seal carcasses.
The bottom line is the commercial seal hunt cannot be conducted humanely. Several factors prevent the annual kill from ever being humane. The speed at which it is conducted (this year, in just one week 20,000 seals were killed by approximately 39 boats); extreme weather conditions; geographical location and inability of DFO Enforcement to monitor the killing to make sure killing is as humane as possible are just a few examples. It is simply impossible for seals to be killed humanely during the annual seal kill and that’s one compelling reason the killing must be stopped.
LIE #3- The commercial seal hunt is tightly regulated. THE TRUTH – Regulations are inadequate to properly address animal welfare concerns and are not enforced by DFO.
HUMANE?? Photo R. Aldworth/HSI 2011
The Marine Mammal Regulations which govern the killing of seals in the commercial seal hunt are woefully inadequate to properly address animal welfare concerns. For instance, the Regulations allow live and conscious seals to be hooked through the eye socket or jaw and dragged across the ice and into boats. The Regulations allow pups to be shot and left, wounded and suffering, on the ice for extended periods of time before being killed by sealers. Even the much-heralded 3-step process does not satisfy international veterinarian standards for humane slaughter. The 3-step process, introduced by the Canadian government in 2008 as a cynical ploy to stave off a threatened EU-wide seal trade ban, is not even incorporated into the Marine Mammal Regulations; it is simply a licence condition.
In my years observing the seal hunt I saw many violations of the Marine Mammal Regulations. From what I have been reading and seeing of this year’s slaughter, this could very well be the worst in terms of numbers of violations. According to observers, sealers are routinely violating the Regulations and licence conditions – failing to perform the 3-step process, cutting into live and possibly conscious pups, using what appear to be illegal killing implements, killing protected hooded blueback pups, killing for sport, not landing the carcass or the pelt…the list goes on and on. And throughout this brutal bloodbath, where is DFO enforcement? That leads me to the next lie.
LIE #4 – The commercial seal hunt is closely monitored and enforced. THE TRUTH – DFO does not monitor or enforce the killing of seals during the commercial seal hunt in Nova Scotia or Newfoundland.
Pups are routinely wounded with bullets and left suffering on the ice, waiting helplessly for sealers to come and beat them to death. Photo Frank Loftus/HSUS 2011
Observers at this year’s commercial seal hunt are reporting a distinct lack of DFO Enforcement presence in the killing zones. While observers videotaped sealers committing Reg violations for hours, DFO was nowhere in sight. This is nothing new. During my years of observation, DFO was never around to document the killing. Even when Coast Guard boats were in the vicinity, the sealers did what they liked with little or no regard for Regulations or even rudimentary animal welfare, while DFO looked the other way. Each year observers submit hours of unedited footage to DFO showing clear violations of Marine Mammal Regulations. Very few charges are ever laid by DFO as a result of this evidence given to them.
In various conversations I’ve had with DFO regarding the commercial killing of grey seals on islands in Nova Scotia, DFO has confirmed there is no constant monitoring of sealers as they kill seals. In 2007 I was told by a DFO official, “We don’t stand there looking over their shoulder as they’re working” and in 2010 it was confirmed DFO visits periodically just to check up on things. I’ve been advised by someone familiar with Nova Scotia sealers that the periodic DFO visits have more to do with bringing coffee for the sealers than actually monitoring the killing.
On Hay Island, a nature reserve in Nova Scotia, grey seal pups are herded together and beaten or shot to death mere inches from each other Photo R. Aldworth/HSI 2011
The truth is, even if DFO had the will to actually monitor the killing and enforce the Regulations, it is physically impossible to do so. Even in the smaller Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, DFO has never been able to control the sealing boats and for years sealers killed above and beyond the Total Allowable Catch. DFO admitted to reporters a few years ago it was very difficult to control the boats there. If DFO staff cannot control boats in the relatively small Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, how can they possibly claim to be able to control boats in the much larger Northern Gulf or The Front? In previous years, hundreds of boats participated in the commercial seal hunt. In recent years that number has dwindled to a few dozen, but those boats are operating in an area the size of France. DFO has a small number of vessels and limited staff – there is no physical way they can monitor the killing or enforce the law. And yet each year they lie and claim that is precisely what they are doing!
As the reports come in daily and the videos and photographs are shared via YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, the Canadian government has fallen strangely silent. Neither Fisheries Minister Gail Shea nor Prime Minister Stephen Harper have cared to comment publicly about their many falsehoods being exposed. Of course they don’t care to comment, since they believe they don’t have to answer to Canadians, the majority of whom, polling consistently shows, oppose the annual slaughter and object to their taxes being used to fund it. This is why more than ever, Canadians need to make the seal hunt a voting issue.
Coming tomorrow- Lies My Government Told Me (Part 2) dealing with more porky pies told by our government, including such chestnuts as ‘Full utilization of the animal’, ‘Sealing provides much-needed income to coastal communities’ and ‘Sealing is a time-honoured tradition.” What a load of crap…