Today history was made in Ottawa. Liberal Senator Mac Harb’s private member bill calling for the end of Canada’s commercial seal hunt was unanimously approved to pass for second reading. Putting an end to Canada’s cruel and wasteful commercial seal hunt will FINALLY be debated in the Senate!
This is Senator Harb’s third attempt to get the bill through. In 2010 He failed to find a seconder and the motion died a swift death. In 2011 it was reported that Conservative Senator Lowell Murray seconded the motion but other senators voted against allowing the proposal to appear for discussion on the order paper. Senator Harb, undeterred, returned for a third attempt and this time the motion was seconded by liberal Senator Larry Campbell and was then passed unanimously to move forward for second reading and debate.
Senator Harb’s bill calls for an end to the commercial seal hunt and compensation to be given to sealers. The bill does not target or affect the Inuit subsistence hunt which is also exempt from the EU trade ban on seal products.
Reaction to this momentous event has been swift. Humane Society International/Canada issued the following statement:
Reaction from the pro-sealing camp has also been swift. Sealing industry representatives have spoken against calls to end the unprofitable seal hunt, claiming Canada’s sealing industry is “very much alive and well.” They provide some disingenuous facts to back up those dubious claims.
Here, they neglect to mention the profits and exports have been declining with each passing year. In 2011 the seal hunt brought in under $1 million, a figure dwarfed by the millions of dollars the Canadian government spends each year to subsidize the annual slaughter. As well, substantial markets to seal products have closed since 2005. The EU banned seal products in 2010 and Russia – which accounted for 90% of exports – banned sealskins last August. Markets in China, long-promised by the Canadian government, have not materialized.
Hmmmm, just a tad misleading to claim sealskin prices have increased this year when the Newfoundland government gave $3.6M to a processing company to buy all the seal skins to stockpile in case markets pick up in future! And let’s not forget the sum in excess of $17,000 the government paid a St. John’s furrier to shill sealskin at a recent international fur expo at which the only country present that did have a trade ban on seal products was Canada!!
In my opinion, an industry with a dwindling profit margin relying on subsidies from Canadian taxpayers and bailouts from the federal and provincial governments just to keep afloat is clearly NOT “alive and well.” In my opinion, that is a drain on taxpayers should should be ended.
But of course Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette is blaming it all on the Vegetarian Lobby armed with pointy carrots and a secret agenda to turn the world into tofu-eating tree-huggers. And she also wants to market seal meat for our cats and dogs. Oh Senator. Don’t you remember? They tried feeding seal meat to minks on fur farms. The minks all died.
A frank and honest discussion about Canada’s cruel and wasteful commercial seal hunt is long-overdue. Let’s start talking!
Science has been cancelled: Health of our oceans & harp seals sacrificed for east coast votes
There is a DFO letter making the rounds online, defending the 2012 harp seal Total Allowable Catch (TAC) which was set at an unsustainably high 400,000 last week. The letter is signed by Morley Knight, Director-General of Resource Management at DFO, and attempts to mislead convince the public the TAC was set “in accordance with the internationally recognized precautionary approach.”
It’s not surprising DFO has gone into repair mode in response to the bashlash to the news the Fisheries Minister had ignored the advice of his own scientists and had set the 2012 harp seal Total Allowable Catch at the request of sealing industry executives. Both IFAW and HSI condemned the TAC. My own letter, representing Atlantic Canadians, was published in four newspapers.
Nor is it surprising a government bureaucrat signed the editorial defending the TAC; it is highly unlikely any of the ignored scientists would agree to put their name on such a work of fiction.
Mr. Knight seems to be in denial of two concrete irrefutable facts:
(1) The Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat concluded in its most recent Science Advisory Report the harp seal herd is in decline and the 2012 TAC should not exceed 300,000, as anything higher would not respect DFO’s management plan; and
Setting TACs to appease the sealing industry while ignoring scientific advice is not “in accordance with the internationally recognized precautionary approach,” although Mr. Knight seems to expect the public to believe it is.
DFO has a long history of basing conservation decisions based on political expediency rather than science. DFO mismanaged cod into commercial extinction and has consistently failed to protect endangered species such as porbeagle shark and sockeye salmon for “socio-economic” reasons. Now it is placing the future of harp seals at risk.
Sealer about to beat to death 2- or 3-week old pup still almost completely covered in whitecoat Photo: Sheryl Fink/IFAW 2012
I was reading an article in the Ottawa Citizen this morning detailing how the government’s failure to set start dates for the commercial seal hunt in Newfoundland was causing wide-spread concern for the problems it would pose for rural towns along the east coast. Featured in the article were doomsday-style quotes by Canadian Sealers Association executive Frank Pinhorn and Bonavista Mayor Betty Fitzgerald. There were warnings about rapidly expanding hordes of voracious harp seals patrolling the coastline devouring all the cod and dire predictions that if the the hordes weren’t ”controlled” (read: slaughtered via club, hakapik and rifle) the fish would disappear and so would all the jobs on the east coast.
It is difficult to discern if Pinhorn and Fitzgerald are honestly deluded about seals and cod, or are guilty of wilfully spreading misinformation. In any event, both are incorrect in their recent statements to media.
Pinhorn speaks of the “growing seal population,” claiming it is at a record-high of nine to 10 million, while Fitzgerald insists the seal population must be controlled to protect fish stocks. Both Pinhorn and Fitzgerald need to read the latest Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat’s Science Advisory Report in which DFO scientists Mike Hammill and Garry Stenson advise the harp seal population is declining, with a current population of approximately 7 million individuals, and accordingly, the Total Allowable Catch should be reduced by 25%. There has never been credible science supporting these wild claims that seals are preventing fish stocks from rebounding after years of gross human overfishing. In fact, for those who bother investigating the issue, there is an emerging wealth of information to the contrary.
Fitzgerald and Pinhorn are guilty of the sort of irresponsible scaremongering that promotes the misconception seals must be culled to protect fish stocks. In truth, science indicates seals play an important role in our complex marine ecosystem and should be protected for the overall health of our oceans. Fitzgerald and Pinhorn would do well to quit the melodrama and stick to the facts.
In terms of claims that “lack of an April seal hunting season could pose a problem for rural towns along the coast,” the only problem the cancellation of the 2012 Newfoundland harp seal hunt poses is the sealers would miss out on their annual beer-swilling baby seal-bashing social event. As one sealer told Paul Watson years ago, “Every year we gets to go out on the ice, get away from the old lady, drink beer with the boys and whack seals” and as sealer Desmond Adams told media a few years ago, “We all go out for the love of it rather than the money, which isn’t there anymore.” This is not a commercial seal hunt or a hunt for subsistence – this is a yearly social event for people who love beating and shooting to death screaming seal pups. And Canadian taxpayers are footing the bill. That, to me, is a very real problem.
Harp seal pup, Cape Breton, 2009 Photo: B. Curran/ACASC
Tomorrow is International Day of Action for Seals, with demonstrations being held across Canada, in the US, and around the world to show opposition to the slaughter of seals in countries such as Canada and Namibia.
Some may be saying: “It is 2012, why has this slaughter not been shut down yet?!” You need to read this inspiring blog by IFAW’s Sheryl Fink, which shows the giant strides the anti-sealing campaign has made in the past few years, and the huge victories won for seals.
I first got directly involved in the seal hunt issue in 2006 and am amazed at the accomplishments of the past six years and deeply touched by the generosity, compassion and dedication of so many around the world battling on to win protection for seals. We are very close to ending the cruel slaughter once and for all!
Here are a few actions you can take to help protect seals on the International Day of Action for Seals:
1. Attend a demo or rally in your area. Rallies are being held across Canada, the US and internationally. A list can be found on Facebook HERE.
2. Tell your MP to protect seals and provide sealers with opportunities to transition out of this dying industry. Canadians can use THIS FORM to quickly and easily email their Member of Parliament to urge them to protect seals and to show real support by sealers by helping them to transition out of the industry.
3. Tell Prime Minister Stephen Harper to end the commercial seal hunt. The majority of Canadians oppose the commercial seal hunt, yet each year the Harper government lavishes millions of our tax dollars on the annual slaughter. If you live in Canada please use THIS FORM – if you live outside of Canada, please use THIS FORM – to send an email asking him to respect the wishes of Canadians and stop the slaughter.
4. Tell Canadian Ambassador to US Gary Doer to end Canada’s commercial seal hunt. Please use THIS FORM to send a message to Gary Doer urging him to listen to people around the world, protect seals and provide sealers with opportunities to get out of the crumbling sealing industry.
5. Send an email thanking the Russian Federation, Kazakhstan, and Belarus for passing their own seal product ban. The world was shocked when it was discovered recently the Russian Federation, Kazakhstan and Belarus had implemented a ban on import and export of harp seal skins. This was a major blow to the Canadian sealing industry, as Russia was the largest purchaser of Canadian harp seal skins, representing 90% of the market for pelts. The Canadian government is now pressuring Russia to reverse its ban. Now is the time to send a quick message of thanks to those countries and urging them to stand firm in the face of bullying from the Canadian government. Use THIS FORM to let them know the world stands united with them in their efforts to protect defenseless seals from a horrific fate.
Grey seal pups, Hay Island, 2010 Photo: B. Curran/ACASC
6. Send an email to the Canadian Senate to urge protection for Grey Seals. The Senate Committee on Fisheries & Oceans is currently conducting a “study” on a proposed large-scale cull of grey seals in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. It is rumoured Canadian Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield advised the Committee he wants it to recommend a cull regardless of their findings. Send Committee members a reminder that the decision should be made based on SCIENCE, not POLITICAL EXPEDIENCY, and no credible science supports a grey seal cull. In fact, leading Canadian scientists strongly advise against such a cull! Use THIS FORMto send your email to Senate Committee members.
Just when you think the ‘Ottawa Loves Baby Seal Killers’ Farce couldn’t get any more bizarre…it does. The government does something else that makes rational Canadians groan in embarrassment and shake their heads.
“On February 2nd, 2012, all Members of Parliament in the House of Commons will have an opportunity to support Canada’s northern and coastal communities” proudly read the press release issued yesterday by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. “As a sign of support for the individuals who rely on the sustainable seal harvest in Canada, we are asking all Members of Parliament to show their support by wearing a seal fur lapel pin in the House of Commons on February 2nd, 2012.”
What, no seal meat? No seal pâté on tiny pastry cups? No seal ragout served in crystal bowls? No bacon-wrapped seal loin with port reduction? Not a terrine or rillette in sight. Not even a sausage. Just little fuzzy pins. Apparently seal is off the menu again in Ottawa. Maybe after privately hurling back up the seal meat they’d choked down for the cameras in 2009, MPs realized there are limits to which even they will go for sealers.
Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield playing the Inuit Card to blur the line between Inuit subsistence hunt and Atlantic commercial seal hunt.(Photo courtesy DFO)
This “Day of the Seal” or whatever nonsense they were calling it is clearly just another cringeworthy PR stunt put on by the Canadian government to show token support for the doomed commercial sealing industry. And as per usualthe government is playing the Inuit card, blurring the line between large-scale industrialized Atlantic commercial seal hunt and traditional Inuit subsistence hunt (that is, if you consider sitting in a truck listening to music waiting for the seal in the net to drown “traditional.” BTW, the Canadian Veterinarian Medical Association opposes drowning seals in nets as “drowning is considered to be a protracted and, therefore, inhumane form of death”), which are two separate issues.
The press release continued “Sealing is an important economic and cultural driver in Canada’s eastern, arctic and northern communities.”
Arctic and northern communities? Not so much. The Inuit have nothing whatsoever to do with the commercial seal hunt. They do not participate in the commercial seal hunt – theirs is a different hunt targeting a different species of seal. The Inuit are exempt from the EU seal product trade ban which applies to commercial seal products, and the Nunavut government pays Inuit seal hunters an upfront, guaranteed price for seal skins under its Fur Pricing Program.
But the Inuit have allowed themselves to be drawn into this issue and whored-outpimped-out used by the Canadian government in a cynical attempt to fool or emotionally blackmail (hey, whichever works for them) Canadians into accepting the commercial seal hunt as a traditional subsistence hunt when it is most decidedly not.
HUMANE?? Photo R. Aldworth/HSI
These ploys are deeply offensive to the majority of Canadians, who are opposed to the annual slaughter and object to their tax dollars being used to defend and sustain it.
The press release stated, predictably: “Sealing is an important economic and cultural driver in Canada’s eastern, arctic and northern communities. It is a long-standing and integral part of Canada’s rural culture and a way of life for thousands of Canadians.”
No, in actual fact, the commercial seal hunt is a marginal activity involving a tiny fraction of the population of Atlantic Canada. It is an unsustainable pastime that brings in very little revenue, cannot survive without massive subsidies from Canadian taxpayers, and could easily be replaced with a number of viable alternatives.
Liberal Senator Mac Harb seemed to be the sole voice of reason in Ottawa today. Senator Harb said, “The Conservative government is holding yet another photo op instead of being upfront about the end of the commercial seal hunt. The government must tell sealers the truth. The market is dead.”
Senator Harb is quite correct. The commercial sealing industry is dead. It’s been dying a slow death for the past few years and it’s time to do the right thing and let it go. It’s time the Canadian government admits this, stops wasting our tax dollars on embarrassing photo-ops, emotional rhetoric and futile WTO challenges, and moves ahead with a licence buyout which would be a long-lasting solution benefiting everyone, including commercial sealers, Canadian taxpayers and Canada’s international reputation.
Senator Mac Harb, lone voice of reason in Canadian Senate, is calling for action on behalf of imperiled grey seals (photo credit: Erik Brush/CC)
I recently received an email from the office of Senator Mac Harb. Senator Harb seems to be the lone voice of reason within the Canadian Senate. It seems all other senators are blindly chanting the “SEALS MUST DIE!” mantra of the Harper government, following along like sheep with a scheme that will see over 140,000 grey seals slaughtered under the guise of a “targeted removal” but what is actually a vote-grabbing make-work project for sealers disgruntled at collapsed commercial markets for seal products.
And it is in the hands of the Senate Committee that the fate of grey seals lie. The Senate Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans is currently studying the issue and has already heard testimony from DFO officials as well as former members of the Fisheries Resource Conservation Council (the politically-appointed organization that recommended the experimental slaughter of grey seals).
Scheduled to appear next week are the president and executive director of the Canadian Sealers Association.
Notably, there is no indication the Senate Committee will hear testimony from leading scientists speaking against the cull. Effectively, the Committee is only hearing one side of the argument. But that is nothing new for this government. There have been numerous allegations that while discussing the grey seal predation issue, scientists opposed to a cull were removed and replaced by those willing to adhere to the Harper government’s political agenda.
Incidentally, during DFO’s testimony to the Senate Committee, David Balfour, Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Ecosystems and Fisheries Management for DFO suggestedall seal carcasses would be dumped in the water since there are currently no markets for seal products…So…not only unscientific, inhumane and unsustainable, but also wasteful…
The Senate Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans has recently begun a study that could result in the killing of 70,000 grey seals off Canada’s East Coast.
The Fisheries Minister is pushing federal scientists to justify the slaughter of seals through contrived studies and one-sided hearings for political reasons. He has decided to ignore factors such as the impact of uncontrolled foreign overfishing in the waters off our coast and the total lack of scientific proof that seals are affecting the cod’s recovery.
The committee is considering an irresponsible cull that could, in my view, have serious negative impact on the Atlantic ecosystem and the long term health of many species, including cod. This slaughter would also result in untold costs to taxpayers and to Canada’s international reputation.
I have called on the committee to do due diligence and gather scientific evidence from all sides of this issue, not simply the studies that fit in with the unjustifiable goal of killing 70,000 seals. I urge you to write to the committee and its members who can be contacted through the Committee website http://senate-senat.ca/pofo-e.asp.
The government needs to know how Canadians and people around the world feel about this indefensible slaughter.
Hon. Senator Mac Harb
Le Comité sénatorial permanent des pêches et océans a récemment entrepris une étude qui pourrait entraîner la mise à mort de 70 000 phoques gris au large de la côte Est du Canada.
Le ministre de Pêches et Océans pousse ses scientifiques à justifier l’abattage de phoques par des études peu crédibles et des avis tendancieux pour des raisons politiques.
Il a décidé de ne pas tenir compte de divers facteurs, comme les répercussions de la surpêche étrangère non réglementée dans les eaux internationales au large de nos côtes et l’absence totale de données scientifiques qui prouvent que les phoques menacent réellement le rétablissement des stocks de morue.
Le Comité examine la possibilité d’un abattage irresponsable qui pourrait, à mon avis, avoir de graves répercussions sur l’écosystème de l’Atlantique et sur la santé à long terme de bien des espèces d’animaux, dont la morue. Non seulement ce carnage serait très coûteux pour les contribuables, mais il porterait aussi atteinte à la réputation du Canada sur la scène internationale.
J’ai pressé le Comité de faire preuve de précaution et de rassemble et d’examiner les preuves scientifiques de toutes les parties concernées, et non uniquement les études qui viennent appuyer un objectif injustifiable, celui d’abattre 70 000 phoques. Je vous exhorte à communiquer avec le Comité et avec ses membres. Écrivez-leur sur le site Web du Comité en cliquant http://senate-senat.ca/pofo-f.asp.
Le gouvernement doit connaître l’opinion des Canadiens et des gens du monde entier sur ce carnage indéfendable.
Minister's shocking revelation: "Seals aren't vegetarians or vegans."
Yes, those sage words were uttered by our very own Minister of Few Words this afternoon to a Canadian Press journalist. The Minister had remained strangely silent while the furor grew over the Fisheries Resource Conservation Council’s recommendations for a massive grey seal cull (unlike his predecessor Gail “Media Whore” Shea who loved talking to the media to the point of fabricating announcements). After reading Ashfield’s quotes online today, I personally think he should have remained silent a little longer.
Yes, Minister, seals do eat fish. So do other marine predators, such as whales, sharks and dolphins. Are you suggesting we should kill those species as well, just in case they’re to blame? After all, you don’t know for sure seals are responsible for the failure of Gulf of St. Lawrence fish stocks to rebound. You just think they’re the “most likely” cause. So if the idea is to kill a massive number of seals as an experiment to see if it helps fish stocks, why not kill a massive amount of all predators in the oceans and really double your chances of success! Not scientific enough for you? It’s about as scientific as taking your science advice from a bunch of knuckle-dragging fishermen who “clean up real good” to sit in front of the Senate Committee and lie their asses off.
But I digress. Shortly after the FRCC released its report which recommended the removal of 140,000 grey seals in the Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence over a five year period, two of Canada’s leading marine biologists spoke out against the scheme, branding it politically motivated and scientifically irresponsible. Hal Whitehead, a professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax specializing in the study of whales said:
Boris Worm, a Dalhousie biology professor who studies marine biodiversity, told media former fisheries minister Gail Shea had spoken in favour of a cull in 2009, and federal scientists have since been pressured to justify that decision. He said:
On September 26, 2011 an open letter was sent to Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield, signed by six marine scientists pointing out that the proposed greal seal cull is not supported by science and could have unexpected disastrous effects on our oceans. The signees urged the Minister to meet with independent scientists to discuss the folly of approving a large-scale cull of grey seals.
Minister Ashfield’s reaction is tantamount to a slap in the face to these leading scientists. Obviously the Minister would rather take his science advice from a bunch of biased yes-men and fishermen hand-picked by the Fisheries Minister to sit on the board of the Fisheries Resource Conservation Council. No surprise there, however – Canada’s Department of Fisheries and Oceans is notorious for making decisions based on political expediency and economics rather than conservation.
And Minister, please remind me, because I’m still confused on this point – how do you hope to pay for this cull? The cost of such a large-scale slaughter will be substantial and DFO is currently cutting its budget and slashing science programs. Oh, how silly of me, of course, the Canadian taxpayer will foot the bill for this make-work project for disgruntled sealers. Of course, the taxpayers will unwillingly hand over the cash so the sealers can happily bash and shoot in the skulls of nursing whitecoats and their mothers, and the Harper government can buy all the sealing/fishing votes for the next election. And what do the Canadian taxpayers get? Shafted. Again. Of course.
I’m no scientist, but even I know that to focus on a simplistic prey-predator model such as cod-seal is a recipe for disaster. Our marine ecosystem is a complex food web and removing a large number of one species could have catastrophic results. If I thought there was merit in killing off a large number of one species as an experiment to see if the desired results could be achieved, I would’ve called for a cull of pro-sealing politicians a long time ago!
If anyone had any illusions the Canadian government is being truthful about the commercial seal hunt, those illusions surely have been shattered this past week. I grew up knowing the commercial seal hunt was wrong, the killing was cruel and the whole disgusting business was unnecessary. My grandmother, originally from a remote island known as Rams Island (later renamed Iona before being cleared and its inhabitants moved to the mainland) in Newfoundland, disagreed with my view, and I remember bitter words being spoken on the subject. But when I actually witnessed the killing for myself for the first time in 2007 it struck me – the Canadian public has truly been betrayed by the Canadian government. The Canadian government uses our taxes to fund the killing and misleads us in regard to every single aspect of the sadistic practice, while branding people like me – who have seen the slaughter with their own eyes – liars. I have never lied about what I have witnessed in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia. The Canadian government is the guilty party. Here are just a few of the many lies told by our government:
LIE #1: Baby seals aren’t killed. THE TRUTH: Oh yes, they are – even protected whitecoats and bluebacks are killed by sealers.
This seal pup is almost completely covered in white fur and was likely 14 days old when it was killed. Not even eating solid food, still very much a baby. Photo Frank Loftus/HSUS 2011
The Canadian government claims all seals killed in the commercial seal hunt are self-reliant adults. In actual fact, seals targeted during the commercial seal hunt are between the ages of 12 days and three months, with most being under one month of age. Many, like the pup in the photo here, are still almost completely covered in white fur at the time of their death. At this age they are not swimming, nor are they eating solid food. Recently weaned, they live on fat reserves built up from their mom’s milk until they’re ready to leave the ice and swim away.
In truth, a seal can legally be killed once it begins moulting its whitecoat, which usually happens at about 12 days of age. Recently weaned, unable to swim, escape or defend themselves against sealers, they are as helpless as babies and certainly are NOT the self-reliant adults DFO would like you to believe are the target of the commercial seal hunt.
The Canadian government is quick to point out that since 1982 it has been illegal to kill whitecoats (harp pups younger than 12 days) and bluebacks (hooded seal pups younger than 14 months). This ban came into effect following an EU-wide ban on whitecoat seal products which caused the sealing industry to collapse. The Canadian government has been silent on reports coming from observers that sealers were documented killing protected bluebacks.
LIE #2 – The commercial seal hunt is humane. THE TRUTH – Every year observers compile hours of videotaped evidence sealers routinely violate woefully inadequate Regulations and inflict horrific cruelty on seal pups.
Conscious seal pups are stabbed through the eye socket and jaw with metal hooks and hauled onto boats - this is NOT illegal and is documented each year. Photo: Frank Loftus/HSUS 2011
I observed the commercial seal hunt from 2007 – 2010 and the horrors I witnessed will stay with me forever. I was unable to travel to Newfoundland this year but have been following closely reports from Humane Society International/Canada and IFAW observers. The reports have been grisly, to put it mildly. Just a few instances:
Sealers failing to perform 3-step process, slicing open seal pups still alive and possibly conscious;
Seal pups showing conscious reaction to pain – voluntary movement – after being sliced open and hurled into the bottom of sealing boat;
Seal pups being shot in close proximity to each other as they desperately try to escape;
Seal pups being shot in the face, neck and back, suffering on the ice for long periods of time before boats reach them to finish them off;
Seal pups being shot on the ice and just left to die – sealers not even retrieving them from the ice – killing for sport;
Terrified seal pups being harassed and manhandled by sealers posing for photos.
This video, by International Fund for Animal Welfare, shows a seal pup sliced open and thrown into a boat, waving and clenching a front flipper in pain as it bleeds to death slowly in the bottom of the boat with other seal carcasses.
The bottom line is the commercial seal hunt cannot be conducted humanely. Several factors prevent the annual kill from ever being humane. The speed at which it is conducted (this year, in just one week 20,000 seals were killed by approximately 39 boats); extreme weather conditions; geographical location and inability of DFO Enforcement to monitor the killing to make sure killing is as humane as possible are just a few examples. It is simply impossible for seals to be killed humanely during the annual seal kill and that’s one compelling reason the killing must be stopped.
LIE #3- The commercial seal hunt is tightly regulated. THE TRUTH – Regulations are inadequate to properly address animal welfare concerns and are not enforced by DFO.
HUMANE?? Photo R. Aldworth/HSI 2011
The Marine Mammal Regulations which govern the killing of seals in the commercial seal hunt are woefully inadequate to properly address animal welfare concerns. For instance, the Regulations allow live and conscious seals to be hooked through the eye socket or jaw and dragged across the ice and into boats. The Regulations allow pups to be shot and left, wounded and suffering, on the ice for extended periods of time before being killed by sealers. Even the much-heralded 3-step process does not satisfy international veterinarian standards for humane slaughter. The 3-step process, introduced by the Canadian government in 2008 as a cynical ploy to stave off a threatened EU-wide seal trade ban, is not even incorporated into the Marine Mammal Regulations; it is simply a licence condition.
In my years observing the seal hunt I saw many violations of the Marine Mammal Regulations. From what I have been reading and seeing of this year’s slaughter, this could very well be the worst in terms of numbers of violations. According to observers, sealers are routinely violating the Regulations and licence conditions – failing to perform the 3-step process, cutting into live and possibly conscious pups, using what appear to be illegal killing implements, killing protected hooded blueback pups, killing for sport, not landing the carcass or the pelt…the list goes on and on. And throughout this brutal bloodbath, where is DFO enforcement? That leads me to the next lie.
LIE #4 – The commercial seal hunt is closely monitored and enforced. THE TRUTH – DFO does not monitor or enforce the killing of seals during the commercial seal hunt in Nova Scotia or Newfoundland.
Pups are routinely wounded with bullets and left suffering on the ice, waiting helplessly for sealers to come and beat them to death. Photo Frank Loftus/HSUS 2011
Observers at this year’s commercial seal hunt are reporting a distinct lack of DFO Enforcement presence in the killing zones. While observers videotaped sealers committing Reg violations for hours, DFO was nowhere in sight. This is nothing new. During my years of observation, DFO was never around to document the killing. Even when Coast Guard boats were in the vicinity, the sealers did what they liked with little or no regard for Regulations or even rudimentary animal welfare, while DFO looked the other way. Each year observers submit hours of unedited footage to DFO showing clear violations of Marine Mammal Regulations. Very few charges are ever laid by DFO as a result of this evidence given to them.
In various conversations I’ve had with DFO regarding the commercial killing of grey seals on islands in Nova Scotia, DFO has confirmed there is no constant monitoring of sealers as they kill seals. In 2007 I was told by a DFO official, “We don’t stand there looking over their shoulder as they’re working” and in 2010 it was confirmed DFO visits periodically just to check up on things. I’ve been advised by someone familiar with Nova Scotia sealers that the periodic DFO visits have more to do with bringing coffee for the sealers than actually monitoring the killing.
On Hay Island, a nature reserve in Nova Scotia, grey seal pups are herded together and beaten or shot to death mere inches from each other Photo R. Aldworth/HSI 2011
The truth is, even if DFO had the will to actually monitor the killing and enforce the Regulations, it is physically impossible to do so. Even in the smaller Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, DFO has never been able to control the sealing boats and for years sealers killed above and beyond the Total Allowable Catch. DFO admitted to reporters a few years ago it was very difficult to control the boats there. If DFO staff cannot control boats in the relatively small Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, how can they possibly claim to be able to control boats in the much larger Northern Gulf or The Front? In previous years, hundreds of boats participated in the commercial seal hunt. In recent years that number has dwindled to a few dozen, but those boats are operating in an area the size of France. DFO has a small number of vessels and limited staff – there is no physical way they can monitor the killing or enforce the law. And yet each year they lie and claim that is precisely what they are doing!
As the reports come in daily and the videos and photographs are shared via YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, the Canadian government has fallen strangely silent. Neither Fisheries Minister Gail Shea nor Prime Minister Stephen Harper have cared to comment publicly about their many falsehoods being exposed. Of course they don’t care to comment, since they believe they don’t have to answer to Canadians, the majority of whom, polling consistently shows, oppose the annual slaughter and object to their taxes being used to fund it. This is why more than ever, Canadians need to make the seal hunt a voting issue.
Coming tomorrow- Lies My Government Told Me (Part 2) dealing with more porky pies told by our government, including such chestnuts as ‘Full utilization of the animal’, ‘Sealing provides much-needed income to coastal communities’ and ‘Sealing is a time-honoured tradition.” What a load of crap…
Yesterday marked the first day of the commercial seal hunt in Newfoundland, in an area referred to as The Front, and almost immediately the horror stories began to surface of the horrific cruelty being documented by licenced observers of the slaughter.
Sheryl Fink, Director of Seals Program for International Fund for Animal Welfare, reported sealers were not performing the 3-step process which is part of their sealing licence conditions, and at least one sealer was using what appeared to be an illegal weapon. As well, she reported sealers were killing seal pups just for the sake of killing them, leaving their carcass and pelt on the ice for the birds to peck. During these repeated violations of Marine Mammal Regulations, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Enforcement was nowhere to be found.
Rebecca Aldworth, executive director of Humane Society International/Canada reported witnessing pups being shot while in the water (a practice condemned by the Canadian Veterinarian Medical Association) and gaffed while still alive. Again, DFO was nowhere to be seen.
These eyewitness accounts expose the despicable lies behind the Canadian government’s claims that the seal hunt is closely monitored and tightly regulated. This is video footage taken by HSI/Canada on the first day of the slaughter:
I observed the Canadian commercial seal hunt in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland from 2007 to 2010 and know full-well the agony these pups are suffering at the hands of the brutal Newfoundland sealers, and the trauma felt by observers having to bear witness to such despicable acts. Although I could not be there this year, my heart is with the seals and I am helping to spread the information I’m getting online through Twitter and Facebook.
Please take action right now to help end this brutal slaughter. To find out how you can help, please visit the websites of IFAW and Humane Society International
WOW. A federal party leader tells voters he wants to continue wasting their tax dollars on a cruel and unprofitable industry nobody needs or wants; and the voice of one million Canadian voters is silenced by a consortium of television broadcasters when Green Party leader Elizabeth May was excluded from leader debates…today was a huge FAIL for democracy in this country.
TV Broadcast Consortium decides what Canadian voters are allowed to see and hear
DEMOCRACY DENIED: Elizabeth May excluded from leadership debates
The Green Party appeared today before the Federal Court of Appeal to challenge a decision of a broadcast consortium to exclude Green Party leader Elizabeth May from televised party leader debates occurring on April 12th and 14th. Federal Court Justice Marc Nadon, after hearing arguments from both sides, refused a judicial review prior to the debates.
This is a flashback to 2008 when the broadcast consortium (comprised of CBC CBC/Radio-Canada, CTV, Global and TVA), which has no set rules and makes decisions on the fly, shut May out of the debates but later relented as a result of a huge public outcry. There is an even bigger outcry this time, but it appears to have fallen on deaf ears.
There are so many things that disturb me about this, I scarcely know where to begin. The consortium is claiming the Green Party doesn’t get a seat at the debate because it holds no seats in Canada. Is that relevant? The Green Party received one million votes in the 2008 election – clearly there are MANY Canadians who want to hear what Elizabeth May has to say. Voters have a right to hear plans and opinions of all major party leaders on all important issues facing this country. And yet…our rights are being violated by a group of TV broadcasters?!?!
Secondly, the lawyer for the consortium alleged that if May were included in the debate, the other leaders wouldn’t attend the debate and there would be no debate. What’s going on here? Party leaders originally told the consortium they didn’t want May in the debate but seemed to relent, announcing they didn’t mind if she attended. At least that’s what they said publicly. What they said in private must have been something quite different, prompting the consortium’s legal counsel to state they would likely not participate in the debate if May were included. Do we really want to elect a leader who will not engage in meaningful debate and who conspires to silence the voice of one million Canadians and deprive Canadian voters of the opportunity to hear what the Green Party has to say?
And then of course there’s the ludicrous fact that the leader of a political party running in ONLY ONE PROVINCEgets a seat at the debate table, while a registered political party with candidates running all across the country is refused a seat…surreal. Someone actually responded to one of my many tweets on this subject today, saying “You can’t force other people to listen to your message.” This isn’t about forcing anyone to listen. This is about democracy and freedom of speech. Personally, I don’t want to listen to Harper (or any of the other leaders, for that matter) drone on and on but I would defend his right to take part in the debates. It’s democracy – something that is becoming alarmingly scarce in this country. Polling is showing the majority of Canadians want Elizabeth May at the debates. Anyone who feels they are being “forced” to listen to the Green Party can use the mute button on their remote when it’s May’s turn to speak ;)
Elizabeth May has now asked other party leaders to “step up and demonstrate that they believe in the principles and the practice of a healthy democracy by telling the consortium that there will be no debate without me.“ It will be most interesting to see how the other party leaders will respond to this.
Meanwhile, Elizabeth May is embarking on a cross-country series of rallies. She’ll be here in Halifax on Saturday, April 9th from 12 – 1 pm at Sackville Landing, 1655 Lower Water Street, Halifax. I’m looking forward to attending that event and showing my support for the Green Party and for democracy. I hope to see you there!
Michael Ignatieff: “Screw you, Canadian Taxpayers! I Want the Sealing Vote!”
Iggy giving the thumbs up while trying to keep the gag reflex down
CBC reported today that Conservative candidate for St.John’s South-Mount Pearl, Loyola Sullivan, had complained BC Liberal MP Hedy Fry was plotting to shut down the commercial seal hunt and demanded Ignatieff denounce Fry’s intentions.
Loyola Sullivan was formerly Canada’s Ambassador for Fisheries Decimation Conservation and was part of a Canadian delegation at the public hearing held in Brussels, where speakers made their case for and against commercial seal hunting. Sullivan’s group was present to promote the inherently inhumane Canadian commercial seal hunt as a humane and regulated activity, yet could not bring himself to watch video footage of the killing as it was shown to the hearing by Humane Society International. According to an eyewitness in the room, Sullivan averted his face until the video had finished.
It was not surprising that Sullivan would indulge in such cheap pandering to the rabid pro-sealing vote in Newfoundland and Labrador. Nor was Ignatieff’s response to the challenge surprising. In a statement published on the Liberal Party website, Ignatieff reiterates his support for the commercial seal hunt and his intention to continue to support and defend it.
What was surprising, however, was the tired old chiches and clear ignorance of the issue contained in the official statement. Using words like “humane”, ‘sustainable”, “traditional” and “commercially viable” are used. Seriously? Really? Wake the hell up, man.
Michael Ignatieff shows a woeful ignorance of the issue. I have witnessed the commercial seal hunt over the past five years and I find it incredibly offensive he blindly insists the killing is humane. He has never personally witnessed it, and I suggest he do so this year before even attempting to make such claims. Likewise, I suggest he look into the finances, comparing the millions of dollars required to keep the failing industry afloat versus the paltry “profits” generated, before considering calling it sustainable and commercially viable. And of course he drags the Inuit into it, referring to “Aboriginal and fishing communities” and a “subsistent hunt.” Iggy is enthusiastically pimping out Inuit for the pro-sealing vote, just as Harper’s government has been doing.
Of course, while Ignatieff is banging on about supporting the sealing industry and commercial sealers, what he’s really saying is “Screw you, Canadian taxpayers” since it is the Canadian taxpayer who will be doing the actual supporting of the failing industry and the savage sealers. Polling consistently shows the majority of Canadians oppose the cruel seal slaughter and object to their tax dollars being used to fund it. Yet every year the federal government lavishes millions on the crumbling industry. Seemingly, Ignatieff is prepared to throw good money after bad and continue funding the brutal activity using an unlimited supply of tax dollars from an unwilling Canadian public. Shame.